<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.eurjchem.com/lib/pkp/xml/oai2.xsl" ?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/
		http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
	<responseDate>2026-05-04T23:37:58Z</responseDate>
	<request identifier="oai:ojs.www.eurjchem.com:article/1781" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://www.eurjchem.com/index.php/eurjchem/oai</request>
	<GetRecord>
		<record>
			<header>
				<identifier>oai:ojs.www.eurjchem.com:article/1781</identifier>
				<datestamp>2018-12-31T07:23:25Z</datestamp>
				<setSpec>eurjchem:ART</setSpec>
				<setSpec>driver</setSpec>
			</header>
			<metadata>
<oai_dc:dc
	xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/
	http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Theoretical calculation of the exchange coupling constant in some polymeric nickel(II) complexes using range-separated functionals</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Makhyoun, Mohamed Abdalla</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Massoud, Raghdaa Adel</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Curie-Weiss law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">DFT calculations</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Coupling constant</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Magnetic parameters</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Magnetic susceptibility</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Exchange correlation functional</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The magnetic parameters (J, g) of two nickel(II) 1D polymers (Ni(en)(ox) and Ni(ox) (ampy)2; where en = ethylene diamine, ox = oxalate, ampy = 4-amino-pyridine) were calculated using 6-311+G* basis set and six range-separated DFT functionals (CAM-B3LYP, LC-BLYP, wB97, wB97X, wB97X-D3 and B2T-PLYP) together with the hybrid B3LYP method for sake of comparison. We found that the wB97, CAM-B3LYP and wB97X-D3 methods gave approximate value of J for compound 1 and the B2T-PLYP method was found to be the best method for compound 2. The g values were calculated by the coupled perturbed approach. However, we assume that a higher approximation is needed in order to give satisfactory results for g. A new equation has been proposed to relate the experimental susceptibility to the J and g parameters. The Curie-Weiss law was included in this equation resulting in a good explanation of the steep part of the experimental curve below 20 K.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Atlanta Publishing House LLC</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-12-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://www.eurjchem.com/index.php/eurjchem/article/view/1781</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.5155/eurjchem.9.4.382-385.1781</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">European Journal of Chemistry; Vol. 9 No. 4 (2018): December 2018; 382-385</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2153-2257</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2153-2249</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://www.eurjchem.com/index.php/eurjchem/article/view/1781/pdf_1781</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Authors</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
			</metadata>
		</record>
	</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
