OPEN ACCESS | PEER-REVIEWED | RESEARCH ARTICLE | DOWNLOAD PDF | VIEW FULL-TEXT PDF | TOTAL VIEWS
Biotechnological treatment of effluent from the combined enzymatic-ultrasound scouring of raw wool
Dancho Yordanov (1,*) , Rositza Betcheva (2) , Lubov Yotova (3)
(1) Department of Textile Chemistry, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, Sofia, BU-1000, Bulgaria.
(2) Department of Textile Chemistry, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, Sofia, BU-1000, Bulgaria.
(3) Department of Textile Chemistry, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, Sofia, BU-1000, Bulgaria.
(*) Corresponding Author
Received: 24 Mar 2010 | Accepted: 24 Mar 2010 | Published: 31 Mar 2010 | Issue Date: March 2010
New eco-labels for textile products and demands to wastewater discharges are forcing wool scouring processes to reuse wastewater and to search for more efficient and environmental friendly methods of processing. This challenge has prompted intensive research in new advanced treatment technologies. Due to the high level of detergent usage, the most widely used treatment of wool scouring effluent (WSE) is anaerobic. As the pressure to use more environmentally acceptable treatment methods increases there is the need to study alternative, biologically efficient treatment systems for WSE. This work aims at studying the influence of the combined enzymatic-ultrasound scouring of raw wool fibers on the effectiveness of the anaerobic treatment of effluents from this processing. Experiments carried out combined enzyme and ultrasound scouring of wool followed by treatment of effluents obtained. Aerobic and anaerobic treatments of these effluents were performed using a special laboratory reactor. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) of effluents from different scouring processes were defined. The results of this study indicate that the anaerobic biological and chemical treatments of WSE treated by combined enzymatic-ultrasound scouring is a promising alternative technology from the point of view of reducing the wastewater pollution and the effective cleaning of effluents coming out from this process.
Links for Article
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | |
Article MetricsThis Abstract was viewed 1368 times | PDF Article downloaded 407 times
. M. Zoccola, A. Montarsolo, R. Mossotti, A. Patrucco, C. Tonin
Green Hydrolysis as an Emerging Technology to Turn Wool Waste into Organic Nitrogen Fertilizer
Waste and Biomass Valorization 6(5), 891, 2015
. Norman, P. I.; Seddon, R. J. Soc. Dyers Colour. 1991, 107, 215-218.
. Sachs, J.; Meyer, P.; Rkehauer, P. Water Research 2003, 37, 973-982.
. Oxley, P.; Brechtelsbauer, C.; Ricard, F.; Lewis, N.; Ramshaw, C. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39(7), 2175-2182.
. Brechtelsbauer, C.; Lewis, N.; Oxley, P.; Ricard, F. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 2001, 5(1), 65-68.
. Stankiewicz, A.; Moulijn, J. A. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41(8), 1920-1924.
. Vicevic, M.; Boodhoo, K.; Scott, K. Chem. Eng. J. 2007, 133, 43-57.
. Silvaa, C. J. S. M.; Prabaharana, M.; Gubitzb, G.; Cavaco-Pauloa, A. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 2005, 36, 917-922.
Can't connect to PubMed
. Silvaa, C. J. S. M.; Prabaharana, M.; Gubitzb, G.; Cavaco-Pauloa, A. Enzyme Micro. Tech. 2006, 39, 634-640.
. Silvaa, C. J. S. M.; Guebitz, G.; Cavaco-Paulo, A. J. Chem. Tech. & Biotech. 2006, 81(1), 8-16.
. Schroeder, M.; Schweitzer, M; Lenting, H. B. M.; Guebitz, G. M. Biocatalysis biotransfor. 2004, 22, 299-305.
. Tchobanoglous, G.; Burton, F. L.; Stensel, H. D. Metcalf & Eddy Fourth edition. 2002.
. 5210 B. 5-Day BOD Test. Approved by Standard Methods Committee, 1997. http://www.norweco.com/html/lab/test_methods/5210bfp.htm.
. 5220 B. Open Reflux Method. Approved by Standard Methods Committee, 1997. http://www.norweco.com/html/lab/test_methods/5220bfp.htm.
How to cite
The other citation formats (EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | BibTeX | RefWorks) for this article can be found online at: How to cite item
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.5155/eurjchem.1.1.12-14.9
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Save to Zotero Save to Mendeley
European Journal of Chemistry 2010, 1(1), 12-14 | doi: https://doi.org/10.5155/eurjchem.1.1.12-14.9 | Get rights and content
- There are currently no refbacks.
© Copyright 2010 - 2021 • Atlanta Publishing House LLC • All Right Reserved.
The opinions expressed in all articles published in European Journal of Chemistry are those of the specific author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the views of Atlanta Publishing House LLC, or European Journal of Chemistry, or any of its employees.
Copyright 2010-2021 Atlanta Publishing House LLC. All rights reserved. This site is owned and operated by Atlanta Publishing House LLC whose registered office is 2850 Smith Ridge Trce Peachtree Cor GA 30071-2636, USA. Registered in USA.