European Journal of Chemistry

Modeling the aromatase inhibitor activity of indole-imidazole derivatives: Quantitative structure activity relationship and molecular docking

Crossmark


Main Article Content

Rawan Mustafa Ali Massad
Ahmed Elsadig Mohammed Saeed

Abstract

In the present study, 19 compounds of indole-imidazole derivatives were studied to obtain the structure requirements to inhibit the active sites of the aromatase enzyme. 2D quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) were analyzed using the partial least squares (PLS) method. To build the QSAR model, the data set was randomly split into a training set (15 compounds) and a test set (4 compounds) for the external validation of the model. As a result, a model with three descriptors (diameter, Petitjean, Q_VSA_FPNEG) was found to be robust enough to predict the aromatase inhibitor activity of the indole-imidazole derivatives, with an R2 of 0.892 and Q2 of 0.741. A series of 57 new compounds was modeled and designed; Of these, only 18 compounds were found to have biological activity greater than that of letrozole (the reference compound). These compounds were docked to the active site of aromatase to understand their inhibitory action and their binding energy toward the aromatase enzyme. Analysis of energy of the 18 compound-aromatase complexes revealed that compound 48 has a low binding energy (strong binding affinity) to aromatase as compared to letrozole; the energy of this compound is less by 7 units than that of letrozole. This compound is enhanced by an electron-withdrawing group (COOH) at the meta position of the phenyl ring of indole.


icon graph This Abstract was viewed 8 times | icon graph Article PDF downloaded 2 times icon graph Article SUPP. MATER. downloaded 0 times

How to Cite
(1)
Massad, R. M. A.; Saeed, A. E. M. Modeling the Aromatase Inhibitor Activity of Indole-Imidazole Derivatives: Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship and Molecular Docking. Eur. J. Chem. 2026, 17, 26-33.

Article Details

Share
Crossref - Scopus - Google - European PMC
References

[1]. Spinello, A.; Ritacco, I.; Magistrato, A. Recent advances in computational design of potent aromatase inhibitors: open-eye on endocrine-resistant breast cancers. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2019, 14 (10), 1065-1076.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2019.1646245

[2]. Bassatne, A.; Bou Khalil, A.; Chakhtoura, M.; Arabi, A.; Van Poznak, C.; El-Hajj Fuleihan, G. Effect of antiresorptive therapy on aromatase inhibitor induced bone loss in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Metabolism 2022, 128, 154962.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2021.154962

[3]. Kaur, K.; Jaitak, V. Recent Development in Indole Derivatives as Anticancer Agents for Breast Cancer. ACAMC. 2019, 19 (8), 962-983.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1871520619666190312125602

[4]. De Filippis, B.; Agamennone, M.; Ammazzalorso, A.; Amoroso, R.; Giampietro, L.; Maccallini, C.; Sağlık, B. N.; De Simone, C.; Zuccarini, M.; Kaplancıklı, Z. A.; Fantacuzzi, M. Discovery and Evaluation of Novel Sulfonamide Derivatives Targeting Aromatase in ER+ Breast Cancer. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18 (8), 1206.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18081206

[5]. Boszkiewicz, K.; Piwowar, A.; Petryszyn, P. Aromatase Inhibitors and Risk of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Adverse Effects in Breast Cancer Patients-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JCM. 2022, 11 (11), 3133.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113133

[6]. Gobbi, S.; Rampa, A.; Belluti, F.; Bisi, A. Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Breast Cancer: An Update. ACAMC. 2014, 14 (1), 54-65.
https://doi.org/10.2174/18715206113139990306

[7]. Sabet, R.; Khabnadideh, S.; Mohseni, S.; Mojaddami, A.; Rezaei, Z. QSAR analysis of some azole derivatives as potent aromatase inhibitors. Trends in Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies 2018, 4, 205-218.

[8]. Numazawa, M.; Komatsu, S.; Tominaga, T.; Yamashita, K. Structure-Activity Relationships of Estrogen Derivatives as Aromatase Inhibitors. Effects of Heterocyclic Substituents. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 56 (9), 1304-1309.
https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.56.1304

[9]. Ghosh, D.; Lo, J.; Egbuta, C. Recent Progress in the Discovery of Next Generation Inhibitors of Aromatase from the Structure-Function Perspective. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59 (11), 5131-5148.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01281

[10]. Edris, A.; Abdelrahman, M.; Osman, W.; Sherif, A. E.; Ashour, A.; Garelnabi, E. A.; Ibrahim, S. R.; Bafail, R.; Samman, W. A.; Ghazawi, K. F.; Mohamed, G. A.; Alzain, A. A. Design of Novel Letrozole Analogues Targeting Aromatase for Breast Cancer: Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics, and Theoretical Studies on Gold Nanoparticles. Metabolites 2023, 13 (5), 583.
https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13050583

[11]. Chamduang, C.; Pingaew, R.; Prachayasittikul, V.; Prachayasittikul, S.; Ruchirawat, S.; Prachayasittikul, V. Novel triazole-tetrahydroisoquinoline hybrids as human aromatase inhibitors. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 93, 103327.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103327

[12]. Kang, H.; Xiao, X.; Huang, C.; Yuan, Y.; Tang, D.; Dai, X.; Zeng, X. Potent aromatase inhibitors and molecular mechanism of inhibitory action. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 143, 426-437.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.11.057

[13]. Ozcan-Sezer, S.; Ince, E.; Akdemir, A.; Ceylan, O. O.; Suzen, S.; Gurer-Orhan, H. Aromatase inhibition by 2-methyl indole hydrazone derivatives evaluated via molecular docking and in vitro activity studies. Xenobiotica 2018, 49 (5), 549-556.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00498254.2018.1482029

[14]. Singla, R.; Gupta, K. B.; Upadhyay, S.; Dhiman, M.; Jaitak, V. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel indole-benzimidazole hybrids targeting estrogen receptor alpha (ER-α). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 146, 206-219.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.01.051

[15]. Pingaew, R.; Mandi, P.; Prachayasittikul, V.; Prachayasittikul, S.; Ruchirawat, S.; Prachayasittikul, V. Synthesis, molecular docking, and QSAR study of sulfonamide-based indoles as aromatase inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 143, 1604-1615.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.10.057

[16]. Xu, Y.; He, Z.; Liu, H.; Chen, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, M.; Lu, X.; Wang, C.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Yu, Y.; Yang, M. 3D-QSAR, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation study of thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole-5-carboxamide derivatives as LSD1 inhibitors. RSC. Adv. 2020, 10 (12), 6927-6943.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA10085G

[17]. Du, M.; Zhang, D.; Hou, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, Y. Combined 2D-QSAR, Principal Component Analysis and Sensitivity Analysis Studies on Fluoroquinolones' Genotoxicity. Intern. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16 (21), 4156.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214156

[18]. Begum, S.; Jaswanthi, P.; Venkata Lakshmi, B.; Bharathi, K. QSAR studies on indole-azole Analogues using DTC tools; imidazole ring is more favorable for aromatase inhibition. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2021, 98 (1), 100016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jics.2021.100016

[19]. Molecular Operating Environment (MOE), 2024.0601 Chemical Computing Group ULC, 910-1010 Sherbrooke St. W., Montreal, QC H3A 2R7, 2026.

[20]. Rustagi, V.; Gupta, S. R.; Singh, A.; Singh, I. K. Beyond trial and error: Leveraging advanced software for Therapeutic discovery. Chem Biol Lett 2025, 12 (1), 1251.
https://doi.org/10.62110/sciencein.cbl.2025.v12.1251

[21]. Wang, R.; Shi, H.; Zhao, J.; He, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J. Design, synthesis and aromatase inhibitory activities of novel indole-imidazole derivatives. Bioorg. amp; Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23 (6), 1760-1762.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.01.045

[22]. Mateos-Aparicio, G. Partial Least Squares (PLS) Methods: Origins, Evolution, and Application to Social Sciences. Commun. Stat. - Theory Methods 2011, 40 (13), 2305-2317.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03610921003778225

[23]. Park, D. S.; Kim, J. M.; Lee, Y. B.; Ahn, C. H. QSID Tool: a new three-dimensional QSAR environmental tool. J. Comput Aided Mol Des 2008, 22 (12), 873-883.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-008-9219-2

[24]. Li, R.; Du, Y.; Shen, J. Molecular modelling studies on cinnoline-based BTK inhibitors using docking and structure-based 3D-QSAR. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2018, 29 (11), 847-873.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2018.1518927

[25]. Tong, W.; Lowis, D. R.; Perkins, R.; Chen, Y.; Welsh, W. J.; Goddette, D. W.; Heritage, T. W.; Sheehan, D. M. Evaluation of Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship Methods for Large-Scale Prediction of Chemicals Binding to the Estrogen Receptor. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38 (4), 669-677.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ci980008g

[26]. Grabowski, T.; Jaroszewski, J. J.; Feder, M. Correlations between the selected parameters of the chemical structure of drugs and between-subject variability in area under the curve. Med Chem Res 2012, 22 (4), 1812-1824.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-012-0187-7

[27]. García-Domenech, R.; Alarcón-Elbal, P.; Bolas, G.; Bueno-Marí, R.; Chordá-Olmos, F. A.; Delacour, S. A.; Mouriño, M. C.; Vidal, A.; Gálvez, J. Prediction of acute toxicity of organophosphorus pesticides using topological indices. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2007, 18 (7-8), 745-755.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10629360701698712

[28]. ACD/ChemSketch, Version 2012; Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc.: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2012; https://www.acdlabs.com

[29]. Ghosh, D.; Griswold, J.; Erman, M.; Pangborn, W. Structural basis for androgen specificity and oestrogen synthesis in human aromatase. Nature 2009, 457 (7226), 219-223.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07614

[30]. Haidar, S.; Marminon, C.; Aichele, D.; Nacereddine, A.; Zeinyeh, W.; Bouzina, A.; Berredjem, M.; Ettouati, L.; Bouaziz, Z.; Le Borgne, M.; Jose, J. QSAR Model of Indeno[1,2-b]indole Derivatives and Identification of N-isopentyl-2-methyl-4,9-dioxo-4,9-Dihydronaphtho[2,3-b]furan-3-carboxamide as a Potent CK2 Inhibitor. Molecules 2019, 25 (1), 97.
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010097

[31]. Qin, L.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Mo, L.; Zeng, H.; Liang, Y. Predictive QSAR Models for the Toxicity of Disinfection Byproducts. Molecules 2017, 22 (10), 1671.
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22101671

[32]. Qin, L.; Liu, S.; Chen, F.; Xiao, Q.; Wu, Q. Chemometric model for predicting retention indices of constituents of essential oils. Chemosphere 2013, 90 (2), 300-305.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.07.010

[33]. Lin, X.; Li, X.; Lin, X. A Review on Applications of Computational Methods in Drug Screening and Design. Molecules 2020, 25 (6), 1375.
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25061375

[34]. Roy, P. P.; Roy, K. Docking and 3D-QSAR studies of diverse classes of human aromatase (CYP19) inhibitors. J. Mol Model 2010, 16 (10), 1597-1616.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-010-0667-y

[35]. Prior, A. M.; Yu, X.; Park, E.; Kondratyuk, T. P.; Lin, Y.; Pezzuto, J. M.; Sun, D. Structure-activity relationships and docking studies of synthetic 2-arylindole derivatives determined with aromatase and quinone reductase 1. Bioorg. amp; Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27 (24), 5393-5399.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.11.010

[36]. Yusuf, D.; Davis, A. M.; Kleywegt, G. J.; Schmitt, S. An Alternative Method for the Evaluation of Docking Performance: RSR vs RMSD. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48 (7), 1411-1422.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ci800084x

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

TrendMD

Dimensions - Altmetric - scite_ - PlumX

Downloads and views

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
License Terms
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

License Terms

by-nc

Copyright © 2026 by Authors. This work is published and licensed by Atlanta Publishing House LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.eurjchem.com/index.php/eurjchem/terms and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial (CC BY NC) (International, v4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). By accessing the work, you hereby accept the Terms. This is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the CC BY NC License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited without any further permission from Atlanta Publishing House LLC (European Journal of Chemistry). No use, distribution, or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. Permissions for commercial use of this work beyond the scope of the License (https://www.eurjchem.com/index.php/eurjchem/terms) are administered by Atlanta Publishing House LLC (European Journal of Chemistry).