OPEN ACCESS | PEER-REVIEWED | RESEARCH ARTICLE | DOWNLOAD PDF | VIEW FULL-TEXT PDF | TOTAL VIEWS
Comparative study of the resolution efficiency of HPLC and HPTLC-densitometric methods for the analysis of mebeverine hydrochloride and chlordiazepoxide in their binary mixture
Adel Magdy Michael (1) , Yasmin Mohamed Fayez (2) , Christine Kamal Nessim (3,*) , Hayam Mahmoud Lotfy (4)
(1) Analytical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ahram Canadian University, 6th of October City, 12566, Egypt
(2) Analytical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, 11562, Egypt
(3) Analytical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ahram Canadian University, 6th of October City, 12566, Egypt
(4) Pharmaceutical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Pharmaceutical Industries, Future University, 12311 Cairo, Egypt
(*) Corresponding Author
Received: 14 Jun 2016 | Revised: 06 Jul 2016 | Accepted: 14 Jul 2016 | Published: 30 Sep 2016 | Issue Date: September 2016
Accurate, rapid, and selective reversed phase HPLC and HPTLC-densitometric methods with UV detection have been developed and validated for simultaneous determination of a binary mixture of mebeverine hydrochloride (MVH) and chlordiazepoxide (CDZ) in their Co-formulation. For the HPLC method, ACE-126-2546 AQ C-18 column, (250×4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm particle size) in isocratic mode, with mobile phase containing 25 mM ammonium acetate buffer: acetonitrile in the ratio of (60:40, v:v), pH adjusted to 3±0.2 by using hydrochloric acid, the flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and detection was performed at 260 nm. The retention times were 7.23±0.01 and 3.85±0.01 min for MVH and CDZ, respectively. For the HPTLC-densitometric method, the separation was performed using stationary phase pre-coated silica gel 60F254 and mobile phase ethyl acetate: methanol (8:4, v:v) were used and scanned at 222 nm with Camag TLC scanner controlled by Wincats Software. The Rf values were 0.26±0.02 and 0.73±0.01 for MVH and CDZ, respectively. The linearity graphs for MVH and CDZ, respectively, were found to be linear over 1-50 μg/mL and 0.5-40.0 μg/mL with mean percentage recoveries 100.14±0.354 and 99.70±0.764 for HPLC method and 0.5-30.0 μg/band and 1-14 μg/band with mean percentage recoveries 100.29±0.665 and 99.68±0.987 for HPTLC-densitometric method. A comparative study of different analytical validation parameters such as accuracy, precision, specificity, robustness was conducted. The obtained results were statistically compared with those of the official methods; using student t-test, F-test, and one way ANOVA, showing no significant difference with respect to accuracy and precision.
Links for Article
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | |
Article MetricsThis Abstract was viewed 1331 times | PDF Article downloaded 357 times
EVA Pharmaceutical Company, Egypt.
. Amal M. Abou Al-Alamein, Mohamed K. Abd El-Rahman, Ezzat M. Abdel-Moety, Esraa M. Fawaz
Green HPTLC-densitometric approach for simultaneous determination and impurity- profiling of ebastine and phenylephrine hydrochloride
Microchemical Journal 147, 1097, 2019
. Yasmin M. Fayez, Christine K. Nessim, Adel M. Michael, Hayam M. Lotfy
Validated Stability-Indicating Chromatographic Methods for the Determination of Chlordiazepoxide and Clidinium Bromide in the Presence of its Alkali-Induced Degradation Product: Kinetic Study
Chromatographia 80(6), 911, 2017
. Maya S. Eissa, Heidi R. Abd El-Hadi, Hala E. Zaazaa, Basma M. Eltanany
Smart TLC–densitometric methods for determination of ophthalmic ternary mixture containing chloramphenicol in the presence of its synthetic precursor: Comparative eco-scaling for greenness assessment
JPC – Journal of Planar Chromatography – Modern TLC 33(5), 501, 2020
. Hayam Mahmoud Lotfy, Yasmin Mohamed Fayez, Adel Magdy Michael, Christine Kamal Nessim
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Smart Stability-Indicating Spectrophotometric Methods Based on Mathematical and Statistical Processing of the Obtained Results Via Different Manipulating Pathways
Current Pharmaceutical Analysis 16(2), 186, 2020
. Reynolds, J. E. F. Martindale The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 29th ed., The Pharmaceutical Press, London, 1989.
. Mcevory, G. K. AHFS Drug Information, American Society of Hospital Pharmacists, 1256-1258, 1990.
. Toral, M. I.; Richter, P.; Lara, N.; Jaque, P.; Soto, C.; Saavedra, M. Int. J. Pharm. 1999, 189, 67-74.
. Patel, S.; Patel, N. J. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 71(4), 472–476.
. Ozkan, S. A.; Erk, N.; Sentiirk, Z. Anal. Lett. 1999, 32(3), 497-520.
. British Pharmacopoeia, Vol. I and II, The Stationery Office on Behalf of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), Crown Copyright, 2013.
. El-Sayed, G. O.; Yasin, S. A.; El Badawy, A. A. J. Chem. Pharma. Res. 2009, 1(1), 225-232.
. Sun, S. R. J. Pharm. Sci. 1978, 67(5), 639-641.
. Shama, S. A.; Amin, A. S. Spectrochim. Acta A 2004, 60, 1769-1774.
. Walash, M.; Sharaf El-Din, M.; El-Enany, N.; Eid, M.; Shalan, Sh. J. Fluoresc. 2010, 20, 1275-1285.
. Ibrahim, H.; Issa, Y. M.; Abu-Shawish, H. M. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2005, 36, 1053-1061.
. El Walily, M. A.; El Gindy, A.; Bedair, F. M. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1999, 21, 535-548.
. Elmasry, M. S.; Blagbrough, I. S.; Rowan, M. G.; Saleh, H. M.; Kheir, A. A.; Rogers, P. J. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2011, 54, 646-652.
. Al-Deeb, O.; Al-Hadiya, B. M.; Foda, N. H. Chromatographia 1997, 44, 427-430.
. Radwan, M. A.; Abdine, H. H.; Aboul-Enein, H. Y. Biomed, Chromatogr. 2006, 20, 211-216.
. Heneedak, H. M.; Salama, I.; Mostafa, S.; El-Sadek, M. Curr. Anal. Chem. 2014, 10(4), 565-573.
. Haggag, R. S.; Shaalan, R. A.; Belal, T. S. J. AOAC Int. 2010, 93(4), 1192-1200.
. Ramadevi, S.; Srikanth, S.; Ashok Kumar, A. Int. J. P. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 7(2), 314-318.
. El-Shaheny, R. N.; Belal, F. F. J. Chem 2015, 2015, Article ID 293719, 1-9.
. Sujana, K.; Hamuthal, M. Z. V.; Murthy, V. S. N.; Shravani, N. Pharm. Anal. Acta 2014, 6(1), 1000324, 1-6.
. Lotfy, H. M.; Fayez, Y. M.; Michael, A. M.; Nessim, C. K. Spectrochim. Acta A 2016, 155, 11-20.
. United States Pharmacopoeia Commission, United States pharmacopeia-National formulary, United States Pharmacopoeial Inc, 2280-2282, 2004.
How to cite
The other citation formats (EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | BibTeX | RefWorks) for this article can be found online at: How to cite item
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.5155/eurjchem.7.3.315-321.1468
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Save to Zotero Save to Mendeley
European Journal of Chemistry 2016, 7(3), 315-321 | doi: https://doi.org/10.5155/eurjchem.7.3.315-321.1468 | Get rights and content
- There are currently no refbacks.
© Copyright 2010 - 2021 • Atlanta Publishing House LLC • All Right Reserved.
The opinions expressed in all articles published in European Journal of Chemistry are those of the specific author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the views of Atlanta Publishing House LLC, or European Journal of Chemistry, or any of its employees.
Copyright 2010-2021 Atlanta Publishing House LLC. All rights reserved. This site is owned and operated by Atlanta Publishing House LLC whose registered office is 2850 Smith Ridge Trce Peachtree Cor GA 30071-2636, USA. Registered in USA.